In view of this, and the fact that stuff can be sourced by non-members (I appreciate it can anyway but always made the assumption that it was by other enthusiasts with a similar bent) how safe are our own copyright bits and pieces, like photos? I don't really want to reduce definition of my prototype photos, but if there is a possibility of uncontrolled usage may decide that I'll reduce the dpi to an unpublishable level. However, if I do that I recognise that they then become a less useful source for members of this forum.
Brian
Brian, basically the minute you put something on the internet it can be viewed or saved by anyone and I mean anyone and can be published, or used / abused. There is no point even right click save disabling as some sort of vain attempt to 'protect' your work or images; all browsers have work arounds to circumnavigate this and do it legally. The only way to preserve your images is to watermark them with a visual mark or something.
In short, if you have anything you don't want, or would be upset, if it got misused or abused then do not put it on the internet, I'll also add that if you did then you'd be spending a long time policing the web to protect your work, the web is too big to do that effectively.....and life is just too darn short
I take the view that I collect an awful lot of free images off the web, so everything I post here or on Flickr is free for everyone else to download, if they are from the shallower end of the pool and abuse it, then so be it and even if they sell it that's fine, I know exactly how little one gets for published material
The one advantage of search bots gleaning all this info is that if your image is misused or stolen then it's very easy for you to find it
So, don't worry about it, save your energies for something more important