Kingfisher Quay - minimum space Scale7 layout

magmouse

Western Thunderer
Screenshot 2025-12-15 at 11.27.28.png

With the launch by the ScaleSeven Group of the 777 Quest micro layout challenge, I’ve been thinking about a baby version of my nascent Basuto Quay layout.

The challenge is to create a layout with a scenic area of no more than 7 square feet, and with a minimum of 7 feet of Scale7 track (see Sir Lamiel’s 777 Quest - ScaleSeven Group for more details.

At first I felt that joining the challenge would be a distraction from my main layout, but then I thought that if the challenge layout was a ‘baby’ version of Basuto Quay, it might be useful way to try out some ideas for trackwork, baseboard construction, scenics, etc.

The rule I have therefore set myself is that as much as possible of Kingfisher Quay must be also useful for Bastuto Quay. This obviously applies to the locos and rolling stock, but also two of the three buildings (pub on the left, harbour master’s office on the right) and the ship.

The layout is on two baseboards, one for the scenic area and one for the fiddle yard - each 100cm x 60cm. With the rounded corners to the back scene, the scenic area is about 6.5 square feet, so nicely within the rules.

Screenshot 2025-12-15 at 11.31.19.png

The track plan is simple - two turnouts, one in the fiddle yard, one in the scenic area.

Track Plan.jpg

Operation will inevitably be simple, but there are three destinations for traffic: the ship at the quayside, the covered goods platform in the warehouse, and the engineering works. The works has it’s own loco, which can appear to collect or deposit wagons to or from the headshunt, or can go and collect from ‘the rest of the world’.

I initially drew the back scene to fully enclose the layout, but it felt claustrophobic, so I reduced it to the shape you see here. The aim is to make a virtue of those scenic elements (rooftops, the ship’s mast and rigging) that spill out of the visual frame.

The lower back scene is also more practical on a layout that may be exhibited and operated from behind, when access to three-link couplings will be needed.

Screenshot 2025-12-15 at 11.29.55.png

Screenshot 2025-12-15 at 11.29.05.png

Screenshot 2025-12-15 at 11.30.20.png

Screenshot 2025-12-15 at 11.30.55.png

To find out more about Basuto Quay, see my blog on RMweb: https://www.rmweb.co.uk/blogs/blog/2642-netherport-and-basuto-quay-gwr-1908-7mm/

Comments and suggestions are welcome!

Nick.

PS You might wonder why it’s called Kingfisher Quay. One of the rules of the 777Quest challenge is there should be an Arthurian reference included in the layout. The Fisher King is a central figure in Arthurian Legend, hence the name.
 

spikey faz

Western Thunderer
View attachment 253365

With the launch by the ScaleSeven Group of the 777 Quest micro layout challenge, I’ve been thinking about a baby version of my nascent Basuto Quay layout.

The challenge is to create a layout with a scenic area of no more than 7 square feet, and with a minimum of 7 feet of Scale7 track (see Sir Lamiel’s 777 Quest - ScaleSeven Group for more details.

At first I felt that joining the challenge would be a distraction from my main layout, but then I thought that if the challenge layout was a ‘baby’ version of Basuto Quay, it might be useful way to try out some ideas for trackwork, baseboard construction, scenics, etc.

The rule I have therefore set myself is that as much as possible of Kingfisher Quay must be also useful for Bastuto Quay. This obviously applies to the locos and rolling stock, but also two of the three buildings (pub on the left, harbour master’s office on the right) and the ship.

The layout is on two baseboards, one for the scenic area and one for the fiddle yard - each 100cm x 60cm. With the rounded corners to the back scene, the scenic area is about 6.5 square feet, so nicely within the rules.

View attachment 253370

The track plan is simple - two turnouts, one in the fiddle yard, one in the scenic area.

View attachment 253371

Operation will inevitably be simple, but there are three destinations for traffic: the ship at the quayside, the covered goods platform in the warehouse, and the engineering works. The works has it’s own loco, which can appear to collect or deposit wagons to or from the headshunt, or can go and collect from ‘the rest of the world’.

I initially drew the back scene to fully enclose the layout, but it felt claustrophobic, so I reduced it to the shape you see here. The aim is to make a virtue of those scenic elements (rooftops, the ship’s mast and rigging) that spill out of the visual frame.

The lower back scene is also more practical on a layout that may be exhibited and operated from behind, when access to three-link couplings will be needed.

View attachment 253367

View attachment 253366

View attachment 253368

View attachment 253369

To find out more about Basuto Quay, see my blog on RMweb: https://www.rmweb.co.uk/blogs/blog/2642-netherport-and-basuto-quay-gwr-1908-7mm/

Comments and suggestions are welcome!

Nick.

PS You might wonder why it’s called Kingfisher Quay. One of the rules of the 777Quest challenge is there should be an Arthurian reference included in the layout. The Fisher King is a central figure in Arthurian Legend, hence the name.
That looks great! I can already imagine what the finished model will look like. :)

I suppose if I were doing something similar (and I am tempted!) I would make the 'rest of the world' area scenic as well. I'd possibly lose the backdrop altogether and separate the two areas with a bridge or something. It just seems a shame to waste that extra space by not having even just some grass/weeds. But, that's just my (mad) thoughts and I'm very much looking forward to seeing the end result. :thumbs:

Mike
 

daifly

Western Thunderer
I suppose if I were doing something similar (and I am tempted!) I would make the 'rest of the world' area scenic as well. I'd possibly lose the backdrop altogether and separate the two areas with a bridge or something. It just seems a shame to waste that extra space by not having even just some grass/weeds. But, that's just my (mad) thoughts......
Mike

That sounds like your design is already being formulated in your head. We look forward to seeing your end result!

Dave
 

magmouse

Western Thunderer
I note that V2 has lost the lucam of V1...is this a simple way to avoid thoughts of Lord Lucan hiding in Basuto Quay...?

Rgds, Graham

Yes, a last-minute check showed that Lord Lucam was not on the list of knights of the round table, and so was rejected.

For anyone wondering what on earth Graham and I are on about, an earlier revision of the warehouse design looked like this:

Screenshot 2025-12-14 at 20.54.28.png

The vertical projecting structure is a Lucam, within which hoists could be used to raise and lower items such as sacks, to (un)load from a barge or wall boat in the water below. It was rejected as being unworkable in its position in relation to the water (a barge would need to be sideways-on to the building, which the corner position prevents), and also too specific - I'd rather be vague about what the warehouse is used for, to allow a wide range of traffic.

Nick.
 

magmouse

Western Thunderer
That looks great! I can already imagine what the finished model will look like. :)

I suppose if I were doing something similar (and I am tempted!) I would make the 'rest of the world' area scenic as well. I'd possibly lose the backdrop altogether and separate the two areas with a bridge or something. It just seems a shame to waste that extra space by not having even just some grass/weeds. But, that's just my (mad) thoughts and I'm very much looking forward to seeing the end result. :thumbs:

Mike

Thanks, Mike. The challenge rules prevent the fiddle yard area being scenic'ed, as that would take the scenic area over the 7 square feet maximum. Part of my motivation for this, as well as testing out ideas and techniques for the main layout, is to have somewhere to run and display goods wagons, which are my main modelling interest. Your post has got me thinking about ways the fiddle yard could also be a display area, if the layout was exhibited.....

Nick.
 

spikey faz

Western Thunderer
Thanks, Mike. The challenge rules prevent the fiddle yard area being scenic'ed, as that would take the scenic area over the 7 square feet maximum. Part of my motivation for this, as well as testing out ideas and techniques for the main layout, is to have somewhere to run and display goods wagons, which are my main modelling interest. Your post has got me thinking about ways the fiddle yard could also be a display area, if the layout was exhibited.....

Nick.
Ah! Apologies, I hadn't seen that bit in the rules. Makes sense.

Mike
 

NewportRod

Western Thunderer
Thanks, Mike. The challenge rules prevent the fiddle yard area being scenic'ed, as that would take the scenic area over the 7 square feet maximum. Part of my motivation for this, as well as testing out ideas and techniques for the main layout, is to have somewhere to run and display goods wagons, which are my main modelling interest. Your post has got me thinking about ways the fiddle yard could also be a display area, if the layout was exhibited.....

Nick.
Nick (and Mike too!),
Once the challenge is over there's no reason why your layout should not have a second life with a scenic FY and you can run your scrumptious wagons in a more sympathetic environment.
Rod
 

magmouse

Western Thunderer
could always have two 7 sq ft layouts attached so that each formed the fiddle yard for the other.

I think you are referring to the 141414Quest challenge....

(though 0-14 to S7 standards is an attractive option...)

Oh - you're ahead of me...

Slightly more seriously - but only slightly - it did occur to me that this could be the start of a modular system, for example inserting the engineering works between this layout and the fiddle yard, or putting something the other side of the fiddle yard.

Nick.
 

magmouse

Western Thunderer
Nick (and Mike too!),
Once the challenge is over there's no reason why your layout should not have a second life with a scenic FY and you can run your scrumptious wagons in a more sympathetic environment.
Rod

I posted a split second after yours appeared. Yes, there are various ways the core idea could be developed. But I do have a main layout I wish to finish within my own lifetime....
 

Scale7JB

Western Thunderer
could always have two 7 sq ft layouts attached so that each formed the fiddle yard for the other.


and no, Dave, I'm too long in the 0MF camp to start rewheeling now!

(though 0-14 to S7 standards is an attractive option...)
Yes, I too wondered if 14mm gauge track would be accepted..

JB.
 

Scale7JB

Western Thunderer
Yes, the challenge was deliberately phrased ‘featuring track to Scale7 standards’ to make it gauge neutral, so any gauge is acceptable.
Rod
Interesting, as I've just received my Paul Martin EDM converted 14mm gauge Bachmann Britomart through the post - that and an EDM models kit for one of the Ffestiniog 'Ladies'..

I'll look up the details...

JB.
 
Top