28ten said:My copy of MRJ 198 arrived from Simon, it may be because I looked at it after the Signals book, but I was a little disappointing, i think it is destined to be one of those 'flick through and file' issues. the most interesting part (to me) was Geoff Kents Ford Thames parcels van.
), the content is very much geared to the interests of the guest editor and perhaps, to a certain extent, who his chums are.
Puds said:A very uninspiring issue, and I fully agree on the above.
Editor means exactly that, you're purpose/role is to edit others work, not your own, nor your friends! For some time now people have said MRJ is becomming cliquey, and it really is.
One interesting quote from the Lowburn Park article is this........
"This layout is not of the sort usually featured in this magazine. There are no grand schemes, no big express engines pulling long trains through sweeping scenery, no new inventive techinques and definetly no cutting edge modelling."
.......and it makes you wonder what many a modellers perception of MRJ is these days. Certainly isn't the inspirational mag that it used to be in it's earlier days, when it contained a dozen articles, several being of the shows-you-how variety!
My issue came with the renewal document enclosed, and I'm seriously wondering whether to bother filling it in!
Cheers SimonSimon said:I have just received supplies of MRJ 200, an enlarged celebratory issue edited by Gerry Beale.
Full of good stuff, but very nice to see Steve Cook's "Dungeness Siding" on page 198 as "Portfolio" - well done Steve!!
Our postman tries to be helpful as well, but he's never forged our signature so far, and if he ever did, I don't think I would be very happy...Dan Randall said:so he signed it himself with an anonymous squiggle and just left it outside the door! Luckily it was still there when someone came home.![]()
28ten said:My good lady brought me a copy home today, and I have to say i was pleasantly surprised after a couple of really poor issues. Totnes is simply stunning and really does show what can be done in 2mm/n, I think Barry Norman would make a rather good editor as he seems to have compiled a well balanced selection of articles

Barry wouldn't want to do it - I know, I asked him.Dan Randall said:Barry Norman would also get my vote for a long term stint in the Editor's chair (unless Gerry Beale could be persuaded to have another go!).
I'm glad it wasn't just me that it didn't 'do it' for. I can't quite put my finger on the reason why, it's a nicely done model, but it's just missing a certain something.28ten said:I was strangely unmoved by the centre spread of D1011 - it just didnt do it for me.
I have studied a lot of maroon Westerns and it just doesnt quite capture the look, it feels a bit 'heavy', too much airbrush work?Pugsley said:I'm glad it wasn't just me that it didn't 'do it' for. I can't quite put my finger on the reason why, it's a nicely done model, but it's just missing a certain something.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.